<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Media with no originality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gchicco.com/2007/12/15/media-with-no-originality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gchicco.com/2007/12/15/media-with-no-originality/</link>
	<description>Gianfranco Chicco&#039;s blog: a place to collect ideas, experiences and random thoughts...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 16:41:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gianfranco Chicco</title>
		<link>http://www.gchicco.com/2007/12/15/media-with-no-originality/comment-page-1/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>Gianfranco Chicco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gchicco.com/?p=8#comment-125</guid>
		<description>Probably you&#039;re right about Wallpaper*. I&#039;m not its usual target, but just one that is interested in design. It&#039;s normal for publications with a long history to have good and &quot;less good&quot; periods.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably you&#8217;re right about Wallpaper*. I&#8217;m not its usual target, but just one that is interested in design. It&#8217;s normal for publications with a long history to have good and &#8220;less good&#8221; periods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juno</title>
		<link>http://www.gchicco.com/2007/12/15/media-with-no-originality/comment-page-1/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>Juno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gchicco.com/?p=8#comment-124</guid>
		<description>Really interesting analysis, I think you&#039;ve identified some really true issues, but I don&#039;t agree with the POV that Wallpaper&#039;s &quot;lost some of it&#039;s edge&quot; - I used to be an avid reader and stopped about five years ago. I picked up an issue in May and now get every copy, it&#039;s far less pretentious than it used to be and now has a cracking sense of humour.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really interesting analysis, I think you&#8217;ve identified some really true issues, but I don&#8217;t agree with the POV that Wallpaper&#8217;s &#8220;lost some of it&#8217;s edge&#8221; &#8211; I used to be an avid reader and stopped about five years ago. I picked up an issue in May and now get every copy, it&#8217;s far less pretentious than it used to be and now has a cracking sense of humour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

